Board Policies
Chapter 1 - System Organization and Administration
Section C - Code of Conduct & Ethics
Click here for a PDF copy of this policy.
1C.2 Fraudulent or Other Dishonest Acts
Part 1. Purpose. MnSCU is committed to creating an environment
where fraudulent and other dishonest acts are not tolerated. All Minnesota
State Colleges and Universities employees are responsible for complying
with the State Code of Ethics (Minnesota
State Statutes 43A.38 - see related documents
below), other state statutes and board policies that govern their
conduct, and ensuring that all resources entrusted to them are used
ethically, prudently, and for their designated purpose. In addition,
to ensure that MnSCU resources are used appropriately, managers and
supervisors are responsible for educating employees about proper conduct,
creating an environment that deters dishonesty and maintaining internal
controls that provide reasonable assurance of achieving management objectives,
and detecting dishonest acts. Furthermore, managers and supervisors
must be cognizant of the risks and exposures inherent in their area
of responsibility and be aware of symptoms of fraudulent or dishonest
acts, should they occur. This policy establishes responsibilities for
investigating potential incidents of fraud or other dishonest acts,
taking remedial actions, and reporting evidence to the Legislative Auditor
and other appropriate authorities.
Part 2. Applicability. This policy applies to all MnSCU trustees
and, employees, including faculty (full-time, adjunct and part-time
faculty), administrative staff, and student employees. It also requires
employees to report the actions of other parties that may result in
financial losses or possible criminal conduct affecting MnSCU resources
or information. These other parties include (1) students; (2) contractors
and vendors; (3) organizations affiliated with MnSCU, including foundations
governed by Policy 8.3; and (4) any other person
or organization that uses MnSCU resources or information, with or without
authorization.
This policy does not apply to destruction or misappropriation of personal
or private property. Those matters shall be reported to appropriate
college, university, or Office of the Chancellor officials and to law
enforcement officials when appropriate. Also, substantiated violations
involving personal or private property are subject to personnel action
or discipline under the student conduct code.
This policy does not apply to allegations of academic misconduct. Those
matters shall be referred to appropriate college or university officials.
This policy also does not apply to allegations of discrimination or
harassment. Those matters are governed by policy
1B.1.
Part 3. Definitions.
Subpart A. Dishonest act. A dishonest act generally involves
a deliberate act or failure to act with the intention of obtaining
an unauthorized benefit, destruction of property or otherwise fraudulent
behavior. Dishonest acts include, but are not limited to:
- Theft or misappropriation of funds, long distance telephone services,
supplies, property, computer software, intellectual property, or
other resources;
- Forgery or alteration of documents;
- Bribery or attempted bribery;
- Unauthorized use of records or access to information systems,
including unauthorized sharing of computer security clearances;
- Unauthorized alteration, manipulation, or destruction of computer
files and data;
- Falsification of reports to management or external agencies;
- Conflicts of interest that pursue a personal benefit or advantage
while compromising the public interest;
- Improper handling or reporting of financial transactions;
- Authorizing or receiving compensation for goods not received or
services not performed;
- Authorizing or receiving compensation for hours not worked;
- Incurring obligations in excess of appropriation authority, and
- Willful violation of laws, regulations or policies, or contractual
obligations when conducting MnSCU business.
Subpart B. Fraud Inquiry. A fraud inquiry is the initial process
for examining complaints, allegations, and other possible evidence
of dishonest acts. The objective of a fraud inquiry is to determine
whether sufficient evidence exists to warrant a fraud investigation.
Subpart C. Fraud Investigation. A fraud investigation is the
process of collecting and examining evidence to determine whether
a dishonest act involving possible criminal action or significant
financial loss has occurred.
Part 4. Responsibilities.
Subpart A. Compliance. Dishonest acts are prohibited pursuant
to this policy and applicable law. Employees found to have committed
a dishonest act as defined by this policy shall be subject to sanctions,
restitution and other remedies as deemed appropriate by MnSCU officials.
Subpart B. Employee reporting of suspected fraudulent or other
dishonest acts. An employee with a reasonable basis for believing
fraudulent or other dishonest acts have occurred has a responsibility
to report the suspected act in a timely manner. Reports should be
made to the employee's immediate supervisor or manager, unless the
employee suspects that the supervisor or manager has participated
in or condoned the act. In that case, the employee should report the
matter to the next highest level of supervision or management or directly
to the college, university, or Office of the Chancellor Director of
Human Resources. Employees are encouraged to report matters through
their designated college, university or Office of the Chancellor channels,
but may report any matters directly to the MnSCU Office of Internal
Auditing. This policy shall not prohibit prompt notification to appropriate
authorities when an immediate threat to personal safety exists or
other circumstances justify such notice. Upon discovering evidence
of possible fraudulent or dishonest acts, employees should not confront
individuals suspected of wrongdoing or initiate fraud investigations
on their own because such actions may compromise any ensuing investigation.
Employees shall not make statements or disclosures knowing they are
false or in reckless disregard of the truth.
Subpart C. Conducting a fraud inquiry. Presidents, the Chancellor,
or the Executive Director of Internal Auditing shall be responsible
for conducting fraud inquiries to determine whether evidence of fraudulent
or other dishonest acts is substantiated and merits a fraud investigation
or other remedy. Presidents or the Chancellor may seek the assistance
of the Office of Internal Auditing in conducting fraud inquiries.
If a fraud inquiry reveals evidence of possible criminal action or
significant financial loss, then a fraud investigation shall be conducted
pursuant to Part 4, Subpart D of this policy. If a fraud inquiry does
not reveal evidence of possible criminal actions or significant financial
loss related to a dishonest act, but substantiates a violation of
state or federal law, MnSCU or college or university policies, or
other applicable requirements, the matter shall be referred to the
appropriate campus or Office of the Chancellor official for further
action. Any incident that reveals possible employee misconduct may
be subject to a personnel investigation by the college, university,
or Office of the Chancellor, as appropriate, and subject to personnel
action in accordance with the provisions of the applicable collective
bargaining agreement or other personnel plan.
Subpart D. Conducting a fraud investigation. If it is determined
under Part 4, Subpart C that a fraud inquiry merits a fraud investigation,
the president or Chancellor shall report the matter to the Office
of Internal Auditing. The president or Chancellor shall consult with
the Executive Director of Internal Auditing to determine responsibilities
for conducting the fraud investigation. The MnSCU General Counsel,
the Legislative Auditor, or other administrative officials also shall
be consulted, as appropriate and when required by this policy.
Part 5. Remedial Actions. If a fraud investigation substantiates
that a violation has occurred, the following remedial actions against
or by MnSCU employees shall be taken as appropriate:
Subpart A. Recovery of Losses. Appropriate action will be
taken to recover assets lost as a result of an act of dishonesty.
Full recovery will constitute the value of benefits gained by an employee
or beneficiary other than MnSCU or the documented loss, whichever
is larger, and, if appropriate, the cost of investigation, recovery,
or other costs. For misuse of long-distance telephone services, recoveries
must include the fair market value of the service, taxes, and interest.
All reasonable means, consistent with state law, will be sought to
recover losses, including voluntary repayments, withholding from salary
and wages, insurance proceeds when applicable, and legal action when
necessary. Significant financial losses shall be reported to the Vice
Chancellor - Chief Financial Officer. Dishonest acts that result in
significant loss or damage to electronic information or information
systems shall be reported to the MnSCU Chief Information Officer.
The MnSCU General Counsel shall determine whether the evidence available
and the cost of recovery justify legal action to recover losses.
Subpart B. Referral to Law Enforcement. A college, university
or Office of the Chancellor shall consult with the MnSCU General Counsel
prior to disclosing private or confidential data on employees to law
enforcement authorities pursuant to Minnesota
State Statutes 13.43, subd. 15.
Subpart C. Internal Control Deficiencies.
The Office of Internal Auditing shall consider whether evidence of
possible fraudulent or other dishonest acts reveals areas or practices
in college, university, or system internal controls needing modification.
The Office of Internal Auditing shall recommend corrective actions
to the president or chancellor, as appropriate, and the Vice Chancellor
- Chief Financial Officer. Internal Auditing shall follow-up on its
recommendations and report progress to the board of trustees consistent
with procedures for audit follow-up.
Subpart D. Employee Disciplinary Actions. Employees found
to have participated in fraudulent or other dishonest acts, or any
employee who hinders a fraud inquiry or investigation by making a
false or misleading statement, or any employee who has knowledge of
a dishonest act, but fails to report it according to this policy shall
be subject to disciplinary action. The appropriate campus official
or Vice Chancellor for Human Resources shall determine whether employee
disciplinary action is warranted. The provisions of collective bargaining
agreements shall be observed for any employee disciplinary proceedings.
Part 6. Data Practices. Fraud inquiry or investigation data
must be handled in accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices
Act and other applicable law.
Part 7. Whistleblower Protection. Employees who report suspected
fraudulent or other dishonest acts pursuant to Minnesota
State Statutes 181.932 shall be protected from retaliation. The
identity of information sources shall be protected when required by
Minnesota
State Statutes 181.932 or Minnesota
State Statutes 13.392.
Part 8. Other Policies. This policy shall not be construed to
limit the ability to enforce any other applicable policy or law not
incorporated under this policy or to limit the remedies available for
violations that occur.
Part
9. Reporting to the Board of Trustees and the Legislative Auditor.
The Executive Director of Internal Auditing shall notify the Board of
Trustees of any significant violations of law or board policies, as
required by policy 1D.1, or any material departures
from this policy.
The Executive Director of Internal Auditing is responsible for reporting
evidence to the Office of the Legislative Auditor as required by Minnesota
State Statutes 10.47, 43A.39,
and 609.456,
Subdivision 2 and, if federal funds are involved, to the responsible
federal authority. Employees who have reported evidence according to
the provisions of this policy will have fulfilled their statutory reporting
obligations for reporting to the Office of the Legislative Auditor.
| Date of Implementation: |
6/19/02, |
| Date of Adoption: |
6/19/02, |
| Date
& Subject of Revisions:
6/19/02, repeals Board Policy 7.2,
Part 3.
There is no additional HISTORY for
1C.2 at this time. |
-