Federal Legislative Update #4
9/17/03
1. Higher Education
Act Reauthorization
Higher Education Act reauthorization has been heating
up since Congress returned from recess earlier
this month. The piecemeal approach to reauthorization
continues.
Representative
Cole (R-OK) introduced H.R. 3039 Expanding Opportunities
in Higher Education Act on September 9th.The primary purpose of H.R. 3039 is to
ensure that the institutions seeking to serve
students, and particularly needy or nontraditional
students, are treated fairly and equitably under
the Higher Education Act.
Representative
Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) introduced the International
Studies in Higher Education Act (H.R. 3077)
to strengthen international studies in higher
education, and to contribute to fulfilling national
security needs.
Representative
Hoekstra also introduced the Graduate Opportunities
Act (H.R. 3076) which intends to strengthen
the federal investment in graduate education
by recognizing changes in graduate education
and adopting greater flexibility to embrace
new needs as they emerge.
2. H.R. 3039 Expanding
Opportunities in Higher Education Act
Title III
H.R. 3039 would reauthorize the GEAR UP and TRIO programs.
The significant change proposed for Trio would
be the elimination of the requirement to provide
grantees 15 additional points, but still require
the Secretary to award current grantees an undefined
additional amount of points.Under current law, current TRIO grantees
receive 15 additional points in TRIO grant competitions
due to their prior experience in operating a
TRIO program. There is concern that this change will
undermine successful programs by placing their
continued funding at risk.
Other programs under Titles III slated for continuation
include Historically Black Colleges and Universities
and Tribal colleges and Title V - Hispanic Serving
Institutions. The bill strengthens the High School Equivalency Program and College
Assistance Migrant Program. The bill would simplify
the criteria for families eligible to complete
the financial aid need test form and require
improved efforts to inform students and families
who qualify for the free lunch program or food
stamps of their potential eligibility for a
maximum Pell grant. Congressman Emanuel (D-IL) championed this
last provision.
Definition
of Institutions of Higher Education
Presently, there are two definitions of Institutions
of Higher Education. The first definition makes non-profit
colleges and universities eligible for participation
in Title IV programs, as well as all of the
other HEA programs (teacher quality, graduate
education, and others). The second definition makes for-profit
institutions eligible for only the grant and
loan programs of Title IV. H.R. 3039 would allow for-profit institutions
to be eligible for all HEA programs. This would dilute resources presently available
for public and private non-profit institutions
and allow for-profit institutions to receive
grant funding typically reserved for minority
serving institutions and institutions that serve
large numbers of disadvantaged students. For the first time, money that is reserved
for institutions with a public interest mission
that serves predominantly minority and low-income
students would become available to for-profit
schools.
90/10 Rule
Related to the above change, H.R. 3039 would repeal the
current requirement that for-profit institutions
derive 10 percent of their revenue from non-federal
sources.
This would allows a for-profit institution to receive
up to 90 percent of its total income revenue
from Pell Grants, loans, etc. and to potentially
rely on Pell grants and student loans for operational
expenses and their profit margin This 90/10 rule was first enacted as
part of the 1992 HEA amendments. Originally the rule allowed for an 85/15 split and was referred
to as 85/15. The 85/15 rule was changed to 90/10 in
the 1998 HEA reauthorization. The 85/15 rule was implemented to stem
massive fraud and abuse in the student aid programs.
The 90/10 rule now operates as a means to ensure
that for-profit institutions of higher education
have the capacity to stay in business and deliver
a quality education to their students.
50% Rule
To encourage more distance education delivery, H.R. 3039
would repeal the requirement that prohibits
institutions from offering more than 50% of
their courses via distance education or having
more than 50% of their students enrolled in
distance education courses. Oversight provisions for this elimination are
considered by many to be insufficient. Other bills brought forward on this issue
include H.R. 12 (McKeon, R-CA) which would allow
institutions with lower than a 10% cohort default
rate for each of the three most recent years
to offer telecommunications courses in excess
of the 50% rule. H.R. 2193 (Andrews, D-NJ) would allow
institutions to offer telecommunication courses
to students if the institution met additional
financial standards related to financial aid
distribution and had their distance education
programs accredited by an agency that is approved
to accredit distance education program by the
United States Department of Education.
Tuition Increases
The House of Representatives Education Committee leadership
released a paper known as "The College Cost
Crisis." This controversial report declares that the
nation's higher education system is in crisis
as a result of exploding cost increases that threaten
to put college out of reach for low and middle
income students and families. It concludes that
decades of cost increases, in both good economic
times and bad, have caused America's higher education
system to reach a crisis point. The Association for State Colleges and
Universities contend that the criticism toward
tuition increases is wrongly focused. In 27 states, these determinations are
made by state governing or coordinating boards. In 9 states tuition increases are made
by governors and state legislatures. Only in 14 states are tuition increases
made on individual campuses, and then they are
enacted by a board of lay citizens either appointed
or elected through the political process.
An emerging discussion around tuition increases and the
decline of support for higher education at the
state level is the correlation with higher health
care costs. As health care
costs go up Medicaid costs to the state go up and available
state money for higher education (and other
expenditures) goes down. Medicaid is the most rapidly growing
cost in most states.
3. International
Studies in Higher Education Act
A
bill titled the "International Studies in Higher
Education Act (H.R. 3077) was introduced by
Representative Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) to enhance
international and foreign language studies in
higher education in order to improve postsecondary
education while helping to fulfill national
security needs. Hoekstra emphasized the need to provide support
for programs at U.S. colleges and universities
that advance knowledge of world regions, encourage
the study of foreign languages and train Americans
to have a level of international expertise and
understanding. The intent of this bill is to encourage additional coordination
between programs at institutions of higher education
and the agencies that fulfill critical homeland
security needs. H.R. 3077 builds on the international
and foreign language studies programs already
existing, adding new oversight and accountability
through an advisory board. This advisory board,
which would be created in consultation with
homeland security agencies in order to ensure
appropriate coordination between education and
national security goals, will advise and make
recommendations to Congress and the Department
of Education on international education issues.
The bill also updates the purposes of Title
VI programs to reflect the current international
climate, particularly noting the effect of September
11, 2001 on international education. International
studies will not be limited to postsecondary
education. The bill would allow these programs to
serve as national resource centers for K-12
education, providing information on courses
and instruction to be used in elementary and
secondary school classrooms.
4. Graduate
Opportunities Act
H.R. 3076 will build upon the continued success of graduate
education programs focusing on research and
advanced technology. In addition, H.R. 3076 targets an urgent need
for highly qualified faculty and teachers in
subject areas facing severe shortages. The Graduate
Opportunities Act is closely tied to the No
Child Left Behind Act and its goal of placing
a highly qualified teacher in every public classroom
by the 2005-2006 school year. The Graduate Opportunities
Act will encourage students to receive advanced
training in subject areas like math, science,
special education, and the education of students
with limited English proficiency (LEP) which
are facing dire shortages in classrooms across
the country. It is expected that by increasing study in these
areas at the graduate level, a pipeline of trained
faculty will help alleviate shortages at the
K-12 level.
5. Hope Scholarship Tax Credit
Another bill to watch in the House is H.R. 442 which
would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
to allow the Hope Scholarship Credit to cover
fees, books, supplies, and equipment and to
exempt Pell Grants and federal supplemental
educational opportunity grants from reducing
expenses taken into account for the Hope Scholarship
Credit. The bill would stop the practice of
deducting Pell and SEOG grants from a student's
"qualified tuition and related expenses,"
which is used to determine HOPE eligibility.
This change is expected to expand low‑income
students' access to the HOPE credit. The measure's
price tag has been estimated at $3.3 billion
over the next 10 years.
6. Workforce Investment Act
An
evolving bill is under discussion as the Senate
continues to consider its own version of WIA
reauthorization legislation. Staff are building a bill based upon
current law, as the House of Representatives
did with their version (H.R. 1261), which passed
the House in late May. After the Senate committee's bill clears the
full Senate, a House-Senate conference committee
will meet to work out differences between the
two versions.